Mahana Bush

HAWKE’S BAY | LAUNCHED 31st JULY 2026

At the heart of the Anaroa Valley sits Mahana Bush, a titoki-dominated lowland podocarp remnant protected by a QEII covenant since 1998 and still recovering from grazing. Bats have long hunted over the farm at dusk, and in 2022 an acoustic survey found them active there night after night, with hints of roosting nearby. We're following that up. The valley also lies almost 25 kilometres from Te Mata Peak, right on the edge of our Echose Around Te Mata citizen science project’s survey area. Are these the same bats we hear around the peak and Havelock North? Scroll on to see what we’ve found out so far.

Mahana Bush is one of our Pekapeka Patrol monitoring projects, following a clear, step-by-step approach to building a better understanding of local bat populations:

We begin by Establishing whether bats are present and which species are using the area. From there, we work to Understand where and when bats are active, before moving into Act & Innovate, using what we learn to inform practical action on the ground. We then Build Capacity by sharing knowledge and insights, while continuing to Monitor over time to track activity and change.

This page follows the project as the work unfolds, sharing our objectives, field notes, maps and emerging insights. Right now, we're in Phase 1: Establish.

Follow along as we begin to uncover what's happening around Mahana Bush or join the National Bat Survey as a Pekapeka Patroller at the bottom of the page to get involved!

Are bats here?

Which species?

What are they doing?

What’s changing?

Rowe Bush Tabbed Section Master

Mahana Bush

Active – Phase 1 Funding open Specialist project

Objectives

Each project delivers to ten key objectives. To see an overview of objective steps, .

Phase

Phase 1, in progress. To see an overview of project phases, .

Site

Upper Anaroa Valley (5km): 78.5 km² (7,850 ha), 10 km across. Special thanks to the Kirk family for giving access to their lowland forest - Mahana Bush. Thanks also to the Rose family, who owns land in the valley with a spring fed pond popular with long-tailed bats and that hosts a long-term monitoring site.

Deliverables & success criteria

Acoustic survey phase 1 findings report. To see the full breakdown by objective, .

Activities
Activity Description/frequency
Detector deployment Scales progressively through each survey phase — from initial small-scale deployment (Obj 1) to broader coverage (Obj 2, 3 & 5).
Field visits Install / service (SD swap) / retrieval — approx. monthly.
Data processing The Bat Pack, with manual verification.
Analysis Manual analysis to understand site use and identify hotspots.
Reporting Ongoing website content, plus a formal annual report after the season (e.g. August). Includes cross-site comparison where relevant.
Trialling innovative techniques
New
Trials of new conservation actions/survey methods as introduced — reported annually.
Threat ID & conservation recs
New
Annual review of threats present, feeding conservation recommendations.
Landowner/partner liaison Monthly, tied to the detector check visit — short text or video update.
Education & awareness Shared content and resources — weekly.

DOC Bat Recovery Plan – objective alignment

The 1995 DOC Bat (Pekapeka) Recovery Plan sets out five national objectives guiding bat conservation in Aotearoa. Rowe Bush directly contributes to four of these.

  • Research. Our ongoing survey and monitoring work builds the evidence base needed for effective bat management.
  • Status evaluation. Establishing presence, species, and distribution data contributes to national understanding.
  • Protection and monitoring. Long-term monitoring supports population tracking across the species' range.
  • Public awareness. Sharing this project's progress helps build public involvement in bat conservation.

The Plan's remaining objective concerns island-based short-tailed bat translocation, outside the scope of this mainland monitoring project.

Read recovery plan

Project objectives

#Objective
1Establish presence and species (via acoustic survey)
2Refine understanding of activity/distribution across the project area (ongoing survey — may reveal additional species)
3Identify hotspots (foraging/commuting/roosting) and seasonality of activity/distribution
4Identify threats and recommend conservation actions, based on findings from Objectives 1–3
5Establish a long-term monitoring site — track activity over time as a proxy for colony health and a wider indicator
6Trial and develop innovative conservation and survey techniques (e.g. roost boxes, refined methods)
7Cross-site comparison and standardised reporting, using a consistent graphical template — also an educational resource for other ecologists
8Raise awareness and build community engagement — social media, blog, video sharing the project journey (runs from Phase 1, continuously)
9Landowner and community relationship-building (runs from Phase 1, continuously)
10Capacity building and training, delivered online — matures once there's real project substance to teach from

Project phases

Swipe to see more→

#PhaseDescriptionObjectives introducedObjectives continuing
1EstablishConfirm presence, species, initial activity1, 8, 9—
2UnderstandFull picture of distribution, hotspots, seasonality, cross-site comparison2, 3, 78, 9
3Act & InnovateRecommend/trial conservation actions and techniques4, 68, 9
4Build CapacityTraining content matures now there's substance to teach from108, 9
5MonitorLong-term monitoring established and ongoing58, 9, 10

Deliverables & success criteria

Swipe to see more→

ObjectiveDeliverable(s)Success Criteria
1. Presence & speciesBrief report + map, downloadable/shareable, brandedSurvey completed; species confirmed present (or absence established with confidence)
2. Activity & distributionPer-survey report + maps, shown consistently (Survey 1, 2, Cumulative)Sufficient coverage achieved to characterise activity patterns
3. Hotspots & seasonalityHotspot map + seasonal comparison mapsKey hotspots identified; seasonal variation documented
4. Threats & recommendationsRecommendations report/sectionActionable, evidence-based recommendations from Objectives 1–3
5. Long-term monitoringPermanent site established (e.g. SM5), sited at a hotspot; feeds Obj 7Site operational, collecting data on an ongoing (e.g. annual) basis
6. Trial techniquesBrief paper/blog + video/social contentTrial completed and documented with clear findings
7. Cross-site comparisonComparative analysis using a standardised graphical templateComparison completed with ≥1 other site, using the template
8. Awareness & engagementActive social presence; direct public/volunteer engagementChannels active, regularly producing content; genuine engagement
9. Landowner relationships(relationship-based)Landowners hosting the monitoring site are on board and supportive
10. Capacity buildingOnline training content (video, blog, social)Training material published on the website

Field Notes

A running diary from the field — updated whenever there's something worth logging from a site visit, detector check or survey.

Scroll to see more entries

Field Observations

Fresh batteries and a first look at the data

Back out to all three sites, at the Roses’ and the Kirks’, to swap batteries and pull the data, with the detectors left in place and still recording. Back at the lab, the first look was a real surprise: a huge amount of bat activity compared with our other specialist project sites. We’re still just exploring, but thanks to both families this corner of the valley is clearly worth a closer listen this summer.


Two more sites in Mahana Bush

Duncan and Caroline Kirk came to us through the Karamu River Catchment Collective, curious about what might be living in their bush. So today Sites 2 and 3 went out in Mahana Bush, one detector each. No grand plan yet, we’re just exploring: a couple of listening posts to get our feet on the ground. With Site 1 ticking away at Roses Dam next door, that makes three detectors out in the upper Anaroa Road, the upper Anaroa Valley.


Fresh batteries at Site 1

Quick trip back to the Site 1 detector at Roses Dam for a battery change. Same unit, same spot, freshly powered and redeployed to keep the nights rolling. It’s a simple job, but it’s the bit that makes long runs of data possible. I couldn’t help wondering what the first few weeks had picked up, and what this summer might reveal once we scale up.


Long-term monitoring starts at Roses Dam

Mike and Dru Rose came to us through the Echoes Around Te Mata citizen science survey, and they’ve hosted a detector at Roses Dam since last season. This season we went a step further and set up Site 1 on their property as a long-term monitoring site, in the same valley and right next door to Mahana Farm. We’re just exploring, but a steady run of nights should tell us plenty. Roll on summer.

The Data – Mahana Bush

Explore the latest monitoring data, see where activity is being recorded and follow what we’re learning about bats across the project area.

Survey nights

101 nights

All-time detector-nights of listening effort across all sites.

3

Sites monitored

1

Species: Long-tailed bat

7,479

Bat passes recorded

29 min

1st bat after sunset (median) · Site 3

43

Social call recordings

Weekly bat activity

Long term monitoring site (1) only — empty spokes = not surveyed. Destination: 52wk coverage.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
52wk coverage

Each spoke is one week of the year, length and shade showing how much activity the bat detector at our long-term monitoring site picked up. As more seasons of data come in, this builds into a richer year-round “fingerprint” for the site — and doubles as visible evidence of long-term monitoring once it shows near-full-year coverage.

Low High

Bat passes by month

Bars = bat passes by call type (all sites, 2026). Survey night = one detector for one night (effort) — n under months = survey nights.

—
—
—
—
—
—
3
3,771
3,705
—
—
—
Jan —
Feb —
Mar —
Apr —
May —
Jun —
Jul 1 n 100%
Aug 39 n 82% 14% 5%
Sep 61 n 83% 4% 12% 1%
Oct —
Nov —
Dec —
  • Echolocation
  • Foraging
  • Commuting
  • Social

Activity & distribution maps

Click a map to zoom in.

Mahana Bush – bat minutes per night
250% 220% 190% 160% 130% 100%
Mahana Bush – bat calls per night by site
250% 220% 190% 160% 130% 100%
Mahana Bush – social calls per night by site
250% 220% 190% 160% 130% 100%
Mahana Bush – likely roost proximity (relative ranking by emergence timing)
250% 220% 190% 160% 130% 100%
Survey sites – Mahana, Mohi and Rowe Bush projects
250% 220% 190% 160% 130% 100%
Mahana Bush – survey sites
250% 220% 190% 160% 130% 100%

How this compares to other projects

Project Survey Nights Bat Passes Recorded Call-type breakdown Last update Status
Mahana Bush 101 7,479
82% 9% 8% 1%
21 Oct 2026 Active
Mohi Bush 901 10,090
66% 6% 27% 2%
18 Sep 2026 Active
Rowe Bush 1,276 33,173
85% 14% 1%
21 Oct 2026 Active

Call-type key

  • Echolocation
  • Foraging
  • Commuting
  • Social

Expert on the ground

Mark Roper

Ecologist and Founder of The Bat Co. Lab

With more than 20 years of experience across freshwater, fish and bat ecology, Mark brings deep ecological expertise to every project. His work combines scientific rigour, practical field experience and a commitment to building better knowledge and outcomes for bats across Aotearoa.

Through The Bat Co. Lab, Mark combines specialist consultancy with practical tools and innovative approaches to bat monitoring. He is also passionate about making ecological knowledge more accessible and creating opportunities for communities to contribute to bat conservation.

Our project partners

With thanks

We would like to extend our sincere thanks to the Kirk family and Michael and Dru Rose for generously allowing us access to their land as part of the Mahana Bush project. Their support and willingness to host our bat detectors has helped make this important monitoring work possible, contributing valuable information to our understanding of the bats that call this landscape home.

We are incredibly grateful to have their support in helping us learn more about and protect these unique species.

Support bat conservation in action

Support from our community helps turn bat conservation into real, measurable action. Donations fund fieldwork, detector deployment, rapid data analysis, and community-led projects that improve understanding of bat populations and the environments they depend on. Every contribution directly supports practical, science-led work on the ground.

Want to get involved?

Do you live within the project area? Interested in having bat detectors placed on your property? Help us uncover more about the bats living in your local area.

Support the project and help make this research possible. Your sponsorship goes towards the time, expertise and fieldwork needed to monitor and protect our local bat populations.

Follow our journey.